.png)

.png)

All Heads of Public Service Agencies and employees of the Public Sector (Public Service, Island Government and Crown Agencies) must comply with the Public Service Code of Conduct which is legislated in the Public Service Act 2009.
Public Service Code of Conduct
Behave with integrity and honesty
Exercise care and diligence
Be professional, courteous, and treat everyone with respect and without coercion or harassment
Comply with all applicable laws and policies relating to their employment
Comply with all lawful and reasonable instructions
Take reasonable steps to disclose and avoid any real or apparent conflicts of interest in connection with their employment
Ensure the proper and prudent use of government resources
Use official information only for official purposes
Not improperly use their status of authority to seek or obtain a benefit for themselves or any other person or body
At all times act and behave in a manner that upholds and promotes the integrity, values, and good reputation of the Cook Islands Public Service
Code of Conduct Policy
Misconduct
Misconduct is defined as unacceptable behavior, action, or inaction not of the level of serious misconduct in breach of a policy, or which negatively impacts on other employees or the Agency.
Examples of misconduct include but are not limited to the following actions:
Non-compliance with Public Sector policies, code of conduct and values
Failure to perform employment related tasks to specified standards
Failure to report to work without notification to the respective manager or supervisor
Failure to consistently report to work at the specified start time or after any break
Failure to complete the stipulated hours of work required for the position
Use of obscene or threatening language in the workplace
Harassing behaviour of a sexual, racial or discriminatory nature
Unprofessional behaviour in the workplace and publicly which brings the reputation of the department into disrepute
Engaging in activities that undermine the confidence of members of the public in the neutrality of the public sector
Personal attacks on the character of other employees, employers, members of parliament, other government stakeholders and members of the general public – in an official capacity
Publicly criticizing government policies in an official capacity
Misuse of public-funded resources and assets such as offices and school halls, equipment and supplies (phones), communication (emails) and motor vehicles
Soliciting or accepting gifts, rewards or benefits in an official capacity which might actually or apparently compromise the integrity of the employee, department or the public sector
Smoking in restricted areas and/or failing to abide with the agency’s no-smoking policy
Serious Misconduct
Serious misconduct involves serious wrongdoing whereby the actions of an individual are unlawful and/or of such significance as to make the continuation of the employment relationship untenable, or undermines the confidence and trust of parties in the employment relationship.
Persistent misconduct may be classified as serious misconduct which may justify instant dismissal of the individual.
Serious misconduct includes but is not limited to the following actions:
Serious breaches of legislation, specifically the Public Service Act 2009, Ministry of Finance and Economic Management Act 1995-96, and Public Expenditure and Review Committee and Audit Act 1995-96
Serious breaches of Public Sector Policies, Code of Conduct and Values
Improper use or unauthorised disclosure of official or confidential information
Possession or consumption of illicit drugs on work premises
Failure to carry out lawful instructions from one’s employer, manager, or their delegated authority
Fraudulent practice which involves any act, or omission, or misrepresentation, that knowingly or recklessly misleads, or attempts to mislead, a party to obtain a financial or other benefit, or to avoid an obligation as determined by an investigation
Corrupt practice which involves offering, giving, receiving or soliciting, directly or indirectly, anything of value to improperly influence the actions of another party as determined by an investigation
Coercive practice which involves impairing or harming or threatening to impair or harm, directly or indirectly, any party or the property of the party to improperly influence their actions
Collusive practice to achieve an improper purpose, including improperly influencing the actions of another party
Intentional or reckless acts or omissions that lead to theft, waste or improper use of public sector assets
Undeclared conflict of interest which leads to improper influence over a party’s performance of official duties and responsibilities, contractual obligations, or compliance with applicable laws and regulations
Obstructive practices which involve deliberately destroying, falsifying, altering, or concealing evidence material in an agency investigation; making false statements to materially impede an agency investigation; threatening, harassing, or intimidating any party to prevent it from disclosing its knowledge of matters relevant to an investigation, or from pursuing the investigation; or materially impeding the agency’s contractual right to audit or access information
Retaliation, detrimental act (direct or indirect), discrimination against, disadvantage or punishment of whistle blowers or witnesses during the course of employment, because of their actions or cooperation with an agency’s investigation
Employers must take all reasonable steps to ensure that appropriate and sufficient protection is provided for: whistle blowers, witnesses or complainants who make disclosures under this policy.
Employers shall ensure the complainant, is not disadvantaged or threatened.